There's no one else you can tell

Anonymity, amorality, and an asexual wife.

Red Pill has been and needs to always be amoral. Not immoral, amoral. This case study shows an actionable example of why. I start with the difference between men and women. Not morally, but fundamentally. Men value the truth and focus on efficacy while women value the moral high ground and focus on self interest. From there I move onto the weird argument people have where Red Pill guys have to be sexless losers. The best stuff to learn on here is because of the taboo nature of male sexual success. Men have no where else to go when they are struggling, and men have no one else to tell when they are succeeding!

Then I show an example field reports from a famous (as much as I could make one famous) praxeological man and his field report that didn’t make it into book 3, Dread. It shows a man who originally cheats in the wrong way and for the wrong reasons, but eventually uses that abundance to start cheating for the right reasons and the right way. He then leaves it all behind to continue on his marriage.

Does that sounds abhorrent to you? It should, chances are you buy into the moral arguments from the first section. Next time, look at it from an amoral lens. How many things can you see that could improve your life, how many behaviors do you find yourself doing in other situations? What is in any of this for you? Once you can answer that, you’ve understood why amorality is essential to a praxeological man. You’ve stopped approaching the world like a defective women and are starting to see it as a man. A collective shrug and an eye for lessons.

Read on Amazon, or I’ll read it to you!

Morality, and you.

If you’re in a marriage or long term relationship and happen to talk to women, online or off, you’ll eventually have a friend getting divorced or being cheated on. Maybe his wife’s friends know and cover for her, maybe not. But women love to have a high ground on the moral soapbox when it comes to the sexual marketplace.

Author Whisper put it into perspective with his essay on the red pill debate being a waste of time. While his point was specifically about men and women arguing being useless because not only do we not only talk past each other but we can’t even agree on what to argue about.

RP people (men) bring the following assumptions:

They believe that there is one reality and that truth is what accurately describes that reality. The better a statement describes reality, the more true it is. This is factual absolutism.

They believe that good or bad is a matter of opinion, morality is a set of rules societies made up in order to get a result. It’s pointless to argue about whether something is evil, instead of about what effect it has. This is moral relativism.

When men communicate it’s open communication, sharing ideas and using the context to establish truth and how this can control outcomes. They argue about what is true.

Anything outside your frame is amusing intriguing or funny

They believe that arguments are a cooperative process between people who have the goal of achieving a more accurate picture of absolute reality. People may stick to their positions, they can also reverse them if they discover something true. arguments occur between theories, not people. Questioning someone's character is irrelevant.

BP (women) bring the following assumptions:

They believe reality is subjective and truth depends on who you ask. Truth is a codification of one's perspective, and it is pointless to argue about what is true. This is factual relativism.

They believe that there is one set of moral laws, which human discover in a climb towards ethical perfection. Certain people are better or worse based not only on what they do, but also on what they believe. Sure, different ethical systems exist but they can be ranked from worst to best with consensus. This is moral absolutism.

The goal of debate is to establish themselves as the moral authority, and what everyone should do. They argue about what is right.

They believe arguments are competitive, a battle of moral position which allows them to dictate behavior. Arguments occur between people, not ideas. Questioning someone's character is not only relevant, it's the whole point.

♦♦♦

This is why every critique of Red Pilled men doesn’t have anything to do with it’s efficacy, or it’s goals, only how it makes the women who read about it feel. The problem for men is that women see anything that doesn’t coddle or otherwise benefit women is seen as morally reprehensible, and thus, the hill worth dying on.

You have to accept that when you look out for your own interests, you will ultimately not be looking out for her (the royal her) interests. While your interests may align for a time; perhaps you’re raising a family together or buying your first house together or both your incomes going towards an early retirement etc. But they are not the same interests. In other words, you aren’t hers, it’s just her turn.

Then they scream about it being “Morally reprehensible” while their jowls flap in the wind.

Didn’t make the cut

The point is that these field reports can show a man who is looking after his own best interests. When it’s a case of a wife who is wiling to get in line and meet her mans expectations our interests align. When she’s a frigid and fat piece of shit who does not, they don’t. And when I say they don’t I mean it’s taboo to even mention them publicly.

A lot of guys used to call some of the more rakish men in our space liars. There’s no way a man who cheats on his wife, sleeps around when she becomes frigid, divorces her to have more options in his life is willing to talk about it online. But that’s the thing, online anonymous is the only place these sort of men have to discuss any sexual success online. TheUltmateCad said this himself:

“I can’t talk about this at home, at work, with friends or family. They would burn me alive, my wife would leave and take the kids. She gets to sleep around and be a piece of shit wife only to get rewarded for her troubles? Fuck that. You guys are the only people around I can brag about this stuff to and not get fired”

Add to that one of my favorite field reports from years back. A freshly divorced man was starting his sexlife in the bush leagues. At first it was fat divorced women, but as he got more under his belt he started to aim higher. He got to the point where genuinely attractive women took interest in him. In that case, the lesson was that he noticed these women were entitled and bratty. Since he had a less attractive but way more pleasant girl on speed dial he decided the extra looks weren’t worth it.

And that had the effect of women treating him better because he didn’t put up with it.

This field report is another example of what life is like, and why you have to ignore that morality play that women give you. You’re interested in truth and efficacy, so anything outside of that is either amusing, intriguing or funny. If you’re read Dread (and I assume you being the switched on guy that you are, you have) you may know the Litz. What you didn’t know were the field reports of his I left out of the book. They weren’t relevant to the narrative, but they were true.

*Note for new readers: When he describes alpha and beta, what he is describing are sexually desirable behaviors and relationship comfort behaviors. I have to add this disclaimer because retards are online telling people the newest iPhone is alpha and making my job harder.

The only place I can talk about this

Litz 2: Electric Boogaloo